Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.25 seconds)Section 471 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 464 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 467 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Md.Ibrahim & Ors vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 4 September, 2009
11. According to the landmark precedent of Mohd. Ibrahim v. State
of Bihar, 2010 AIR SCW 405, it was held that:
State Of Maharashtra Etc. Etc vs Som Nath Thapa, Etc. Etc on 12 April, 1996
It has been emphasized by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of
Maharashtra v. Somnath Thapa (1996), the importance of corroborative
evidence in proving a criminal conspiracy. The court stated that while the
prosecution need not necessarily prove the exact date or time of the
agreement, it must present evidence that strongly suggests the existence of an
agreement between the accused parties.
Essar Teleholdings Ltd vs Cbi on 29 September, 2015
In Essar Teleholdings Ltd. v. Central
Bureau of Investigation (2021) the hon'ble Supreme Court held that to
establish a case of criminal conspiracy, the prosecution must prove the
existence of an agreement between the accused parties to commit the alleged
offence. The court observed that the mere presence of circumstances that raise
suspicion is not sufficient to prove criminal conspiracy.
State Of Kerala vs P. Sugathan & Anr on 26 September, 2000
Further in State of
Kerala v. P. Sugathan & Ors. (2021) the hon'ble Kerala High Court held that
there is a need for independent evidence to corroborate the allegations of
criminal conspiracy.