Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.27 seconds)
Rajeshkumar Kantilal Rami(Deceased) vs Chairman on 10 September, 2025 cites

Mohammad Shujat, Ali & Ors. Etc vs Union Of India & Ors. Etc on 3 May, 1974

21. Though there a number of decisions on Page 45 of 62 Uploaded by M.H. DAVE(HC00193) on Thu Sep 18 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Sep 20 02:48:50 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/1044/2010 JUDGMENT DATED: 10/09/2025 undefined this very principle, Mohd Shujat Ali v. Union of India, (1975) 3 SCC 76; Dr. B.L. Asawa v. State of Rajasthan, 1982 (2) SCC 55; Zahoor Ahmad Rather v. Sheikh Imtiyaz Ahmad, (2019) 2 SCC 404 .
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 296 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document

Dr. B.L. Asawa vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors on 5 March, 1982

21. Though there a number of decisions on Page 45 of 62 Uploaded by M.H. DAVE(HC00193) on Thu Sep 18 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Sep 20 02:48:50 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/1044/2010 JUDGMENT DATED: 10/09/2025 undefined this very principle, Mohd Shujat Ali v. Union of India, (1975) 3 SCC 76; Dr. B.L. Asawa v. State of Rajasthan, 1982 (2) SCC 55; Zahoor Ahmad Rather v. Sheikh Imtiyaz Ahmad, (2019) 2 SCC 404 .
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 88 - V B Eradi - Full Document

Zahoor Ahmad Rather vs Sheikh Imtiyaz Ahmad on 5 December, 2018

21. Though there a number of decisions on Page 45 of 62 Uploaded by M.H. DAVE(HC00193) on Thu Sep 18 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Sep 20 02:48:50 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/1044/2010 JUDGMENT DATED: 10/09/2025 undefined this very principle, Mohd Shujat Ali v. Union of India, (1975) 3 SCC 76; Dr. B.L. Asawa v. State of Rajasthan, 1982 (2) SCC 55; Zahoor Ahmad Rather v. Sheikh Imtiyaz Ahmad, (2019) 2 SCC 404 .
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 320 - U U Lalit - Full Document

Uma Shankar Sharma vs The Union Of India And Ors on 17 April, 1980

23. Even if some ground exists for the High Court to exercise judicial review, the standard that the High Court would adopt, as indicated in Uma Shankar Sharma v. Union of India, (1980) 3 SCC 202. would be to see that, the terms and conditions of service are [intended to be] construed reasonably, and too technical a view can defeat the essential spirit and intent embodied in them. In light of the law re-iterated above and considering the fact that the employer has not objected Page 47 of 62 Uploaded by M.H. DAVE(HC00193) on Thu Sep 18 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Sep 20 02:48:50 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/1044/2010 JUDGMENT DATED: 10/09/2025 undefined to the appellants diplomas, it was not appropriate for the High Court to take a technical view of the matter and set aside the appointments."
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 36 - R S Pathak - Full Document

Saurav Yadav vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 18 December, 2020

"18. In circumstances where the appointing authority has not objected to the qualifications of the appellants and there is no apparent or glaring difference in the qualifications, we see no reason for courts to interfere and set-aside the appointments made after due consideration. It is the appointing authority which has to take the decision on whether the candidate possesses what is required by the post in cases of disputed equivalence. This Court has stated the same in categorical terms in its decision Anand Page 41 of 62 Uploaded by M.H. DAVE(HC00193) on Thu Sep 18 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Sep 20 02:48:50 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/1044/2010 JUDGMENT DATED: 10/09/2025 undefined Yadav v. State of U.P., (2021) 12 SCC 390 :
Supreme Court of India Cites 49 - Cited by 35 - U U Lalit - Full Document
1   2 Next