Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.53 seconds)The Right to Information Act, 2005
Chief Information Commissioner vs High Court Of Gujarat on 4 March, 2020
Furthermore, the
PIO has relied upon the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Chief
Information Commissioner v. High Court of Gujarat Civil Appeal No. 1966-
1967 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP(C) 5840 of 2015) dated 04 March 2020.
Therefore, no malafide intention can be ascribed over the conduct of the CPIO
and thus, no penal action is warranted in the matter.
Article 11 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Chief Information Commr.& Anr vs State Of Manipur & Anr on 12 December, 2011
In view of the foregoing, this
Commission now refers to Section 18 of the RTI Act while examining the
complaints and in this regard the Commission refers to the judgment of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Chief Information Commissioner and
Another v. State of Manipur and Anr. in Civil Appeal Nos. 10787-10788 of
2011 dated 12-12-2011. The relevant extract of the said decision is set down
below:-
Section 19 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 20 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Centrlal Board Of Sec.Education & Anr vs Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors on 9 August, 2011
5. That the information sought by the complainant is in the form of
queries relating to a pending criminal appeal before the Hon'ble High
Court and such information does not fall within the definition of
'information' as defined under Section 2(f) of the Act. The Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the matter of Central Board of Secondary Education
& Anr Vs Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors (Civil Appeal No.6454 of 2011)
held as under:-
1