Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.52 seconds)Section 16 in The Code Of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Code Of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
S. Ahamed Meeran, S/O. Sultan Mohideen ... vs S. Kumaraswamy, S/O. Sankara Subbu ... on 22 August, 2004
8.The learned counsel appearing for the respondent has
relied upon the order of this Court in the case of S.AHAMED
MEERAN VS. S.KUMARASWAMY reported in 2006(1)CTC
55, wherein it is held that no application for amendment can
http://www.judis.nic.in
5
be allowed after the trial has commenced, unless the Court
comes to the conclusion that inspite of due diligence, the party
could not have raised the matter before the commencement of
trial. The relevant portions are extracted hereunder:
The Insurance (Amendment) Act, 2002
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Rethinam Alias Anna Samuthiram Ammal vs Syed Abdul Rahim on 1 March, 2005
In the decision Rethinam alias Anna Samuthiram
Ammal Vs. Syed Abdul Rahim, 2005(3) CTC 321,
P.K.Misra, J. referring to Section 16 of the Code of
Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act 2002, held that
in respect of the Plaint or Written Statement filed
before 1.7.2002, the Proviso to Order 6, Rule 17,
C.P.C would have no applicability. In the said
http://www.judis.nic.in
6
decision, the learned Judge has held:
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 16 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
1