Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.37 seconds)
Anita Malhotra vs Satish Kumar Sood And Ors on 19 March, 2026 cites

L. J. Leach And Company Ltd vs Jardine Skinner And Co on 22 January, 1957

In L.J. Leach and Co. Ltd. v. Jardine Skinner and Co. [AIR 1957 SC 357 : 1957 SCR 438] it was held that the Court would as a rule decline to allow amendments, if a fresh suit on the amended claim would be barred by limitation on the date of the application. But that is a factor to be taken into account in exercise of the discretion as to whether amendment should be ordered, and does not affect the power of the court to order it."
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 348 - Full Document

T.N. Alloy Foundry Co. Ltd vs T.N. Electricity Board And Ors on 12 February, 2004

16. This view of this Court has, since, been followed by a three-Judge Bench of this Court in the case of T.N. Alloy Foundry Co. Ltd. v. T.N. Electricity Board [(2004) 3 SCC 392] . Therefore, an application for amendment of the pleading should not be disallowed merely because it is opposed on the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CS(OS) 728/2022 Page 13 of 18 By:PRATEEK Signing Date:23.03.2026 06.59.28 ground that the same is barred by limitation, on the contrary, application will have to be considered bearing in mind the discretion that is vested with the court in allowing or disallowing such amendment in the interest of justice.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 91 - Full Document
1   2 Next