Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.75 seconds)
Rajendra Singh And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 16 May, 2023 cites

State Of U.P. vs Vinod Kumar (Dead) And Udai Bhan Singh on 12 March, 1992

10. The entire proceedings of Case No. 2146 of 2003 (State Vs. Bhan Singh & Others) arising out of Case Crime No. 73 of 1980, under Section 307 I.P.C., P.S. Uldan, District Jhansi as well as N.B.W. order dated 11.11.2022, pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhansi as well as the entire proceedings of the said case are, hereby, quashed, subject to the applicants and the opposite party no. 2 shall deposit Rs.5000/- each before the concerned trial court which shall be utilized by the District Legal Services Authority of the district.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 237 - S R Pandian - Full Document

Gian Singh vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 24 September, 2012

7. The law with regards to quashing of a case on the basis of settlement arrived between the parties, is well settled. The Apex Court in the cases of (1) B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another: (2003)4 SCC 675; (2) Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation : (2008) 9 SCC 677; (3) Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others: ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; (4) Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab: (2012) 10 SCC 303; (5) Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. And another: 2013 (83) ACC 278 and (6) Parbatbhai Ahir@Parbatbhai @ Bhimsinbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another: (2017) 9 SCC 641 has held that the cases in which the parties have settled their grievances can be quashed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 81 - Cited by 53834 - R M Lodha - Full Document

Shaifullah & Others vs State Of U.P.& Another on 23 July, 2013

7. The law with regards to quashing of a case on the basis of settlement arrived between the parties, is well settled. The Apex Court in the cases of (1) B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another: (2003)4 SCC 675; (2) Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation : (2008) 9 SCC 677; (3) Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others: ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; (4) Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab: (2012) 10 SCC 303; (5) Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. And another: 2013 (83) ACC 278 and (6) Parbatbhai Ahir@Parbatbhai @ Bhimsinbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another: (2017) 9 SCC 641 has held that the cases in which the parties have settled their grievances can be quashed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 2626 - K N Bajpayee - Full Document

B.S. Joshi & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Anr on 13 March, 2003

7. The law with regards to quashing of a case on the basis of settlement arrived between the parties, is well settled. The Apex Court in the cases of (1) B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another: (2003)4 SCC 675; (2) Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation : (2008) 9 SCC 677; (3) Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others: ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; (4) Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab: (2012) 10 SCC 303; (5) Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. And another: 2013 (83) ACC 278 and (6) Parbatbhai Ahir@Parbatbhai @ Bhimsinbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another: (2017) 9 SCC 641 has held that the cases in which the parties have settled their grievances can be quashed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 11910 - H K Sema - Full Document
1   2 Next