Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.33 seconds)Section 446 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
State Of Rajasthan, Jaipur vs Balchand @ Baliay on 20 September, 1977
In State of Rajasthan, Jaipur v. Balchand, AIR 1977
SC 2447, (Para 2 & 3), Supreme Court noticeably illustrated that the basic rule may
perhaps be tersely put as bail, not jail, except where there are circumstances
.
Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Andhra ... on 6 December, 1977
In Gudikanti Narasimhulu v. Public Prosecutor, High
Court of Andhra Pradesh, (1978) 1 SCC 240, (Para 16), Supreme Court in Para
16, held that the delicate light of the law favours release unless countered by the
negative criteria necessitating that course.
Dataram Singh vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 6 February, 2018
In Dataram Singh v. State of Uttar
Pradesh, (2018) 3 SCC 22, (Para 6), Supreme Court held that the grant or refusal of
bail is entirely within the discretion of the judge hearing the matter and though that
discretion is unfettered, it must be exercised judiciously and in a humane manner
and compassionately. Also, conditions for the grant of bail ought not to be so strict
as to be incapable of compliance, thereby making the grant of bail illusory.
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Etc vs State Of Punjab on 9 April, 1980
In Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia and others v. State of Punjab, 1980 (2) SCC
565, (Para 30), a Constitutional bench of Supreme Court held that the bail decision
must enter the cumulative effect of the variety of circumstances justifying the grant
or refusal of bail.
Section 376 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Income Tax Act, 1961
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar vs Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav & Anr on 18 January, 2005
In Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav,
2005 (2) SCC 42, (Para 18) a three-member bench of Supreme Court held that the
persons accused of non-bailable offences are entitled to bail, if the Court concerned
concludes that the prosecution has failed to establish a prima facie case against him,
or despite the existence of a prima facie case, the Court records reasons for its
satisfaction for the need to release such persons on bail, in the given fact situations.
The rejection of bail does not preclude filing a subsequent application, and the
Courts can release on bail, provided the circumstances then prevailing requires, and
::: Downloaded on - 31/12/2020 20:18:51 :::HCHP
3
a change in the fact situation.
1