Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.20 seconds)The Urban land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999
State Of U.P vs Hari Ram on 11 March, 2013
In Hari Ram (supra)
this Court examined the meaning and context of Sub-sections (3) to (6)
of Section 10 of the ULC Act and held as follows :
Maharaj Singh vs State Of Uttar Pradesh & Others on 2 November, 1976
31. The "vesting" in sub-section (3) of Section 10, in our view,
means vesting of title absolutely and not possession though
nothing stands in the way of a person voluntarily surrendering
or delivering possession. The Court in Maharaj Singh v. State of
U.P. (1977 (1) SCC 155), while interpreting Section 117(1) of
the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 held
that "vesting" is a word of slippery import and has many
meanings and the context controls the text and the purpose and
scheme project the particular semantic shade or nuance of
meaning.
Rajendra Kumar vs Kalyan (D) By Lrs on 2 August, 2000
The Court in Rajendra Kumar v. Kalyan (2000 (8) SCC 99)
held as follows: (SCC p. 114, para 28)
"28. ... We do find some contentious substance in the
contextual facts, since vesting shall have to be a
’vesting’ certain.
1