Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.21 seconds)

Jagdish Lal & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 7 May, 1997

We have given our thoughtful consideration to the matter. The petitioner was re-arrested on 15.04.2014 after he had absconded and in terms of the reply that has been filed his case can be RAMESH KUMAR MALIK 2016.02.08 15:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document (210) CRWP No. 1121 of 2015 (O&M) -3- Jagdish versus State of Haryana and others entertained only after two years of his surrender/arrest as envisaged under Rule 10 (ii) of the Rules. Therefore, at this stage, the petitioner is not entitled to get his application (Annexure P-1) entertained for his release on parole. However, the authority shall consider his application on expiry of two years after his arrest.
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 614 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document
1