Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.28 seconds)Section 24 in The Emigration Act, 1983 [Entire Act]
Section 10 in The Emigration Act, 1983 [Entire Act]
Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Gian Singh vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 24 September, 2012
4 of 5
::: Downloaded on - 08-04-2022 00:48:34 :::
CRM-M-24755-2021 -5-
Hon'ble the Apex Court in the case of "Gian Singh Vs. State of
Punjab and another", reported as 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543, had also
observed that in order to secure the ends of justice or to prevent the abuse of
process of Court, inherent power can be used by this Court to quash criminal
proceedings in which a compromise has been effected. The relevant portion of
para 57 of the said judgment is reproduced hereinbelow:-
Kulwinder Pal Singh Etc vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 12 May, 2016
As per the Full Bench judgment of this Court in "Kulwinder
Singh and others Vs State of Punjab", reported as 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal)
1052, it is held that High Court has power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to allow
the compounding of non-compoundable offence and quash the prosecution
where the High Court is of the opinion that the same is required to prevent the
abuse of the process of law or otherwise to secure the ends of justice. This
power of quashing is not confined to matrimonial disputes alone.
Section 173 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Jayrajsingh Digvijaysingh Rana vs State Of Gujarat & Anr on 20 July, 2012
Learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent No.2
have submitted that in the present case, out of three accused
persons, compromise has been effected only with the present
petitioner and the present case is a case of partial compromise
and have relied upon judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in Jayrajsinh Digvijaysinh Rana Vs. State of Gujarat
and another, reported as 2012(12) SCC 401.
1