Somasundaram vs Palani on 19 July, 1999
In the judgment referred to above, relied on by the counsel for the first respondent, the Division Bench of this Court has held that the signature in vakalat, written statement, cannot be compared with the disputed signature since those documents came into existence only after dispute has arisen between the parties. Further, the Division Bench of this Court has held that only contemporaneous admitted signature can be compared with the disputed signature. It is pertinent to note that the hand written letter is yet to be admitted in evidence. Without the document being admitted in evidence, the same cannot be considered for deciding the issue between the parties. There is no illegaltiy or irregularity warranting interference by this Court with the order of the learned Judge dated 22.06.2015 made in I.A.No.84 of 2014 in O.S.No.4 of 2013.