Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.22 seconds)
Ashu Dhiman vs Smt. Jyoti Dhiman on 15 November, 2018 cites

Mohit @ Sonu & Anr vs State Of U.P.& Anr on 1 July, 2013

In the light of the ratio laid down by this Court referred to hereinabove, we are of the considered opinion that the order passed by the trial court refusing to issue summons on the application filed by the complainant under Section 319 of Cr.P.C. cannot be held to be an interlocutory order within the meaning of sub-section (2) of Section 397 of Cr.P.C. Admittedly, in the instant case, before the trial court the complainant's application under Section 319 of Cr.P.C. was rejected for the second time holding that there was no sufficient evidence against the appellants to proceed against them by issuing summons. The said order passed by the trial court decides the rights and liabilities of the appellants in respect of their involvement in the case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 45 - Cited by 271 - M Y Eqbal - Full Document
1   2 Next