Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 39 (0.61 seconds)
Arunaben Chandulal Dave vs Parthiv Vijaykumar Dave on 19 June, 2023 cites

Ramdas Shivram Sattur vs Rameshchandra Popatlal Shah & Ors on 20 August, 2007

In Ramdas Shivram Sattur v. Rameshchandra @ Ramchandra Popatlal Shah, reported in 2009 (4) MHLJ 551, a case decided by Bombay High Court, wherein the judgment of Gopal Vishnu Ghatnekar (supra) was referred, to answer the question as to whether Tarabai became absolute owner of the suit property on account of her nomination by her deceased husband Shivram in his place under Section 30 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act read with Rule 24 of the Rules framed thereunder, and that, in view of Tarabai's nomination whether in the suit property, her Page 97 of 117 Downloaded on : Mon Jun 19 20:47:24 IST 2023 C/FA/3908/2021 CAV JUDGMENT DATED: 19/06/2023 sons and daughter would have no right, title and interest therein. In view of facts raised, the Court addressed the only question of what would be the status of a nominee who has been validly nominated as a member of the Cooperative Society under Section 30 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act and whether one became the owner of the property or does one represent the legal heirs of deceased member while dealing with the Cooperative Society and is only empowered to act for and on behalf of the true owners.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 12 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next