Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.25 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Limitation Act, 1963
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
National Engineering Industries Ltd vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors on 1 December, 1999
8. It was submitted by the respondent that once a reference has
been made under Section 10 of the Act a Labour Court has to
decide the same and the High Court in writ jurisdiction cannot
interfere in the proceedings of the Labour Court. That is not a
correct proposition to state. An administrative order which
does not take into consideration statutory requirements or
travels outside that is certainly subject to judicial review,
limited though it might be. The High Court can exercise its
powers under Article 226 of the Constitution to consider the
question of the very jurisdiction of the Labour Court, In
National Engg. Industries Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan" this
Court observed: (SCC 13. 393, para 24)
'24. It will be thus seen that the High Court has jurisdiction
to entertain a writ petition when there is an allegation that
there is no industrial dispute and none apprehended which could
be the subject matter of reference for adjudication to the
Industrial Tribunal under Section 10 of the Act, Here it is a
question of jurisdiction of the Industrial Tribunal, which
could be examined by the High Court in its writ jurisdiction.
It is the existence of the Industrial Tribunal (sic dispute)
which would clothe the appropriate Government with power to
make the reference and the Industrial Tribunal to adjudicate
it. If there is no industrial dispute in existence or
apprehended the appropriate Government lacks power to make any
reference"
Section 27 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Sri. Prabhakar vs Joint Director Sericulture Department on 7 September, 2015
In this context the said
decision and observation by learned Labour Court
is contrary to the decision by Hon'ble Apex Court
in case of Prabhakar vs. Joint Director,
Sericulture Department [(2015) 15 SCC 1] wherein
Hon'ble Apex Court observed that:
Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Bhimani Khadi Gramodyog Sangh vs Jitendra Malshi Ninjar on 19 June, 2017
(i)Bhimani Khadi Gramodyog Sangh v. Jitendra
Malshi Ninjar passed in SCA No.15171 of 2010
dated 19.6.2017;
Mahemdabad Municipality vs Rajubhai M Sodha Parmar & on 7 December, 2016
(iii) Mahemdabad Municipality v. Rajubhai M.
Sodha Parmar & 1 passed in SCA No. 417 of 2014
dated 13.12.2016;