Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (1.67 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 13 in The Family Courts Act, 1984 [Entire Act]
Section 10 in The Guardians And Wards Act, 1890 [Entire Act]
Section 12 in The Guardians And Wards Act, 1890 [Entire Act]
Section 25 in The Guardians And Wards Act, 1890 [Entire Act]
Section 12 in The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005
Smt Mangala Suryadevara vs Dr Srinivasa Reddy Appakondu on 8 August, 2016
Insofar as the contention raised by the learned
counsel for the petitioner in the case of Smt. Mangala
Suryadevara Vs. Dr. Srinivasa Reddy Appakondu made
in W.P. Nos.8590-8591/2015 (GM_FC), there is no quarrel
with regard to law laid down by this Court. The Power of
Attorney Holder can appear in the proceedings where the
party is not in a position to attend on all dates of hearing
personally. But in the present case, when the petitioner is
13
able to appear on all dates of hearing personally, in all the
three cases, pending before the Family Court at Bengaluru
and is also able to conduct proceedings pending before this
Court, there is no reason why he is not able to appear
personally before the Family Court, Kolar. It applies to all
cases either pending before the Family Court, Bengaluru
or before this Court or Family Court, Kolar.