Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.28 seconds)

Sanjaybhai Jaikishanbhai Patel vs Chief Controlling Revenue Authority & on 13 June, 2017

10. A careful examination of the above provisions of Section 53 of the Stamp Act, it is clear that the respondent-competent authority has to exercise the discretion to condone the delay of further 90 days beyond a period of 90 days. Therefore, the question arises from which date the period of limitation is required to be considered. This Court in case of Sanjaybhai Jaikishanbhai Patel (supra) after considering the above provisions under Section 53 of the Stamp Act, has held as under:-
Gujarat High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 1 - G R Udhwani - Full Document

The Collector Of Central Excise, Madras vs M/S. M.M. Rubber & Co. Tamil Nadu on 4 September, 1991

"8.It can thus be noticed that there is a bar against entertaining the appeal if filed beyond the period of 90 days from the date of the order of the Collector. The expression "date of the order of the Collector" would give an impression as if the period of limitation would commence from the moment the order is signed by him. However, if the decision in Collector of Central Excise, Madras v. M. M. Rubber and Co., (supra) is taken into consideration, it seems that the Supreme Court was confronted with the almost similar factual situation and it was held in paragraph No.9, 10 and 13 thus:
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 55 - Full Document

The Secretary Of State For India In ... vs Gopisetti Narayanaswami Naidu Garu, ... on 29 April, 1910

In The Secretary of State for India in Council v. Gopisetti Narayanaswami Naidu Guru, ILR 34 Madras 151, construing a similar provision in the Survey and Boundary Act, 1897 the same High Court held that a decision Page 6 of 12 Uploaded by ABHISHEK(HC01389) on Wed Jan 22 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Feb 01 00:33:27 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/9079/2024 ORDER DATED: 13/01/2025 undefined cannot properly be said to be passed until it is in some way pronounced or published under such circumstances the parties affected by it have a reasonable opportunity of knowing what it contains. "Till then though it may be written out, signed and dated, it is nothing but a decision which the officer intends to pass. It is not passed so long it is open to him to tear off what he has written and write something else."
Madras High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 27 - Full Document
1   2 Next