Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.15 seconds)
Atul Namdeo vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 3 January, 2022 cites

Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 7 October, 1994

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in a judgment reported in (1994) 6 SCC 731 (Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee Representing Undertrial Prisoners vs. Union of India and others) and affirmed in Civil Appeal No.1640 of 2010 (Thana Singh vs. Central Bureau of Narcotics) decided on 30.08.2010 has held that if the accused has undergone the custody of half of the sentence then the application requires to be considered on that ground. In the instant case, he has been convicted for life and he has already undergone custody for about 8 years without remission. Hence, we deem it just and necessary that he be enlarged on bail on that ground alone.
Supreme Court of India Cites 31 - Cited by 1024 - A M Ahmadi - Full Document

Thana Singh vs Central Bureau Of Narcotics on 23 January, 2013

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in a judgment reported in (1994) 6 SCC 731 (Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee Representing Undertrial Prisoners vs. Union of India and others) and affirmed in Civil Appeal No.1640 of 2010 (Thana Singh vs. Central Bureau of Narcotics) decided on 30.08.2010 has held that if the accused has undergone the custody of half of the sentence then the application requires to be considered on that ground. In the instant case, he has been convicted for life and he has already undergone custody for about 8 years without remission. Hence, we deem it just and necessary that he be enlarged on bail on that ground alone.
Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 419 - Full Document
1