Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.38 seconds)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 24 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 27A in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 19 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 50 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 17 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Superintendent, Narcotics Central ... vs R. Paulsamy on 30 March, 2000
To Counter the contention of the learned counsel for the
petitioner that the conditions laid down in section 50 of the
N.D.P.S. Act was not complied with at the time of search of the
petitioner; Learned Special P.P. appearing for the Narcotics Control
Board, also relied upon the judgment of Supdt. Narcotics Central
Bureau, Chennai v. R. Paulsamy reported in 2001 CRI. L.J. 117
rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court wherein it has been held
that : Compliance of Ss. 52 and 57 is matter which could be
established only at the trial and could not be prejudged at the
stage of consideration for bail. It is also submitted by the learned
Special P.P. appearing for the Narcotics Control Bureau that in his
statement recorded under section 67 of the NDPS Act the
petitioner has admitted his complicity in the offence and a prayer
has been made by the Narcotics Control Bureau for custodial
interrogation of the petitioner in the jail premises for verification of
the photographs and addresses of the co-accused persons. Hence,
it is submitted by the learned Special P.P. appearing for the
Narcotics Control Bureau the petitioner ought not to be admitted
to bail.
Section 67 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Intelligence Officer, Narcotics C. ... vs Sambhu Sonkar And Another on 2 February, 2001
Thus in view of the change in law the ratio of Sambhu
Sonkar (Supra) is not directly applicable in this case.
1