Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.34 seconds)
Sitaram Yadav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 February, 2022 cites

Arnesh Kumar vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 2 July, 2014

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case due to previous enmity. In support of his submission, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record copy of the FIRs bearing crime No.1152/2020 registered at police Guna, Guna for the offence punishable under Sections 457 of IPC and Crime No.1161/2020 registered at police Station, Guna, Guna, for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 294, 352, 506, 34 of IPC lodged by Harnam Singh Yadav, father of the petitioner, and petitioner himself against Lalaram Yadav, Mohanpal Yadav, Girraj Yadav and Arvind Yadav. It is submitted that Lalaram and Mohan are close relative of respondent No.3-Dharmendra Yadav, husband of the complainant in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner also drew attention of this Court to the FIR bearing Crime No.470/2018 registered at police Station Guna Kotwali lodged by father of the complainant regarding missing of his daughter. Thereafter, in the said case when statement of the complainant (respondent No.2) was recorded before the trial Court, she did not state anything against Dharmendra Yadav, accused in the said case. It is further submitted that apprehending his arrest petitioner filed Criminal Appeal No.6481/2020 before this Court and the said Criminal Appeal has been disposed of by this Court vide order dated 31.12.2020 in the light of the directions contained in Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273 with the 03 following directions:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 25720 - Full Document
1   2 Next