Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.45 seconds)Harbhajan Singh vs Karam Singh And Others on 16 September, 1965
The question so framed, is no longer res-integra as it was
answered by a Full Bench of this Court in Deep Chand's case (supra)
and by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Harbhajan's case (supra) by
holding that the Act does not contain any provision conferring the
SHAMSHER SINGH
2015.07.02 11:20
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
Chandigarh
CWP-3302-1980 [6]
power of review on any officer/authority, much less the authority
exercising power under Section 42 of the Act. A perusal of Section
42 of the Act, reveals that it confers the power, to call for and
examine the legality of any order passed or proceedings taken during
consolidation but does not confer the power of review. The
Additional Director Consolidation, therefore, had no jurisdiction
whether plenary or otherwise to pass the impugned orders
particularly when on the same cause of action, his predecessor, also
while exercising power under Section 42 of the Act, had already
dismissed a similar petition filed by Nathu Ram on 08.11.1963.
1