Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.63 seconds)
Western Coalfields Limited vs Nousabai on 21 June, 2013 cites

State Of J And K And Ors. vs Sajad Ahmed Mir on 17 July, 2006

(i) That, the application was rejected by the appellants herein on 12.07.2004, but inspite of this, the writ petition was filed belatedly on 09.04.2008, which was beyond the period of four years, so in the light of the decision of the Apex Court in the case of State of J. & K V. Sajad Ahmed Mir, Air 2006 SC 2743, the appellants herein had rightly rejected the application, but the learned Single Judge erred in directing for reconsideration of the matter.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 216 - C K Thakker - Full Document

Vidyadhari & Ors vs Sukhrana Bai & Ors on 22 January, 2008

7. A similar issue has been considered by the Apex Court in the case of Vidhyadhari and others vs. Sukhrana Bai and others (2008) 2 SCC 238 where in para 9, the Apex Court has held that a son of a deceased Government servant, though he was born out of second marriage during subsistence of first marriage, is a son for all purposes. It was also a case of compassionate appointment and the Apex Court after considering this aspect has held that such son shall be entitled for compassionate appointment and rejection of the application merely on the ground that petitioner is second son, was not justified.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 49 - V S Sirpurkar - Full Document

Bhagwandas Ichharam Panchal vs Royal Western India Turf Club Limited on 11 August, 1969

In view of the aforesaid position of law, it appears that the judgment relied on by the appellants in Bhagwandas (supra) does not consider the correct position of law and has been decided without considering the provisions as contained in Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and on the basis of which, the appellants herein was not entitled to reject the claim of the respondent.
Bombay High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 5 - Full Document
1