Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.35 seconds)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 227 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Hardeep Singh vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 10 January, 2014
In Hardeep Singh's case (supra), in Paragraph
No.106, it stated as under:
Jaipur Shahar Hindu Vikas Samiti ... vs State Of Rajasthan Tr.Chief Sec.& Ors on 17 April, 2014
"95. At the time of taking cognizance, the court
has to see whether a prima facie case is made out
to proceed against the accused. Under Section
319 Cr.PC, though the test of prima facie case is
the same, the degree of satisfaction that is
required is much stricter. A two - Judge Bench of
this Court in Vikas v. State of Rajasthan, held that
on the objective satisfaction of the court a person
may be 'arrested' or 'summoned.', as the
circumstances of the case may require, if it
appears from the evidence that any such person
not being the accused has committed an offence
for which such person could be tried together with
the already arraigned accused persons."
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Sandeep Kumar vs The State Of Haryana on 28 July, 2023
10. This ratio was followed in a latest decision of the
Apex Court in Sandeep Kumar v. State of Haryana,
reported in 2023 KHC Online 6742 and held that at the
stage of summoning an accused, there has to be a prima
facie satisfaction of the Court.
Section 377 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1