cites: 54156791

1 - 3 of 3 (0.19 seconds)

The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S.Lsakhani Rubber Works on 30 March, 2010 cites

The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Pamwi Tissues Limited on 4 February, 2008

as Insp. charges without appreciating the fact that payments were not made by the assessee within the prescribed "due dates" by which the assessee was required to make payments, in contravention of the decision in the case of CIT vs. Pamwi Tissues Limited 215(CTR) 150 (Bom.)?

Bombay High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 188 - F I Rebello - Full Document

Commr.Of Income Tax vs M/S Alom Extructions Limited on 25 November, 2009

Learned counsel for the revenue at the outset states that she does not wish to press question Nos. 1 and 2 on account of a judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court rendered in CIT v. Alom Extrusions Ltd., (2009) 319 ITR 306 (SC). Accordingly question Nos. 1 and 2 are decided against revenue and in favour of the assessee-respondent.

Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 1142 - S H Kapadia - Full Document

Section 260A in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 20048

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Pamwi Tissues Limited on 4 February, 2008

Commr.Of Income Tax vs M/S Alom Extructions Limited on 25 November, 2009

Section 260A in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]