Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 37 (0.35 seconds)

Shri Kishan Das & Ors vs The State Of U.P. & Ors on 12 September, 1995

The facts and pronouncement in Bani Singh [Bani Singh v. State of U.P., (1996) 4 SCC 720: 1996 SCC (Cri) 848: AIR 1996 SC 2439] cannot be extrapolated to the factual matrix before us. On the contrary the opinion in Ram Naresh Yadav [Ram Naresh Yadav v. State of Bihar, (2014) 14 SCC 238: AIR 1987 SC 1500: 1987 Cri LJ 1856] as well as in Kishan Singh [Kishan Singh v. State of U.P., (1996) 9 SCC 372: 1996 SCC (Cri) 1010: 1992 Supp (2) SCR 305] are available to us to ensure that preventive action is devised to combat the abuse of court process so that facilitative steps are taken to secure the ends of justice.***24.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 19 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

Rajneesh Aggarwal vs Amit J. Bhalla on 4 January, 2001

Vijay D. Salvi, (2015) 9 SCC 622: AIR 2015 SC 2579; Rajneesh Aggarwal v. Amit J. Bhalla, (2001) 1 SCC 631; Gimpex (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Manoj Goel, (2022) 11 SCC 705; M/s. Womb Laboratory Pvt. Ltd. v. Vijay Ahuja & Anr., Criminal Appeal No. 1382-1383 of 2019, dated 11.09.2019 (SC); Bir Singh v. Mukesh Kumar, (2019) 4 SCC 197; Anil Hada v. Indian Acrylic Ltd., (2000) 1 SCC CR No. 134/2024 Brijesh Singla v. Subhra Samanta.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 22 - U C Banerjee - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next