cites: 54218916

1 - 10 of 11 (0.20 seconds)

Panday Minerals Pvt. Ltd. & Ors vs Sanjay Sukhwal & Ors on 4 April, 2018 cites

Section 398 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 1784

Section 397 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 2011

Section 399 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 534

Section 284 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 189

Section 402 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 785

Section 190 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 114

Section 108 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 462

Section 10F in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 748

Chatterjee Petrochem(I) Pvt.Ltd vs Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd.& Ors on 30 September, 2011

In support of the contention, learned counsel relied upon a decision of the Supreme Court in the matter of 'Shanti Prasad Jain vs. Kalinga Tubes Ltd.', AIR 1965 SC 1535 and Chatterji Petrochem vs. Haldia Petrochemicals, 2011(10) SCC 466.

Supreme Court of India Cites 36 - Cited by 18 - A Kabir - Full Document

Shanti Prasad Jain vs Kalinga Tubes Ltd. on 14 January, 1965

In support of the contention, learned counsel relied upon a decision of the Supreme Court in the matter of 'Shanti Prasad Jain vs. Kalinga Tubes Ltd.', AIR 1965 SC 1535 and Chatterji Petrochem vs. Haldia Petrochemicals, 2011(10) SCC 466.

Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 154 - Full Document

1 2 Next