Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.23 seconds)Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 504 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
State Of U.P. vs Waseem & Ors. on 28 May, 2010
10. Accordingly, the proceedings, including including charge-sheet dated 25.10.2015 as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 24.03.2017, of Case No. 8716/2021 (Old Case No.516/2016) (State Vs. Waseem and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 22/2015, under Sections 498A/323/506/504 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S.- Meerganj, District- Bareilly, pending in the court of A.C.J.M.-5, Bareilly, on the basis of compromise, are hereby quashed.
Shaifullah & Others vs State Of U.P.& Another on 23 July, 2013
8. In the aforesaid judgments, the Apex Court has categorically held that compromise can be made between the parties even in respect of certain cognizable and non compoundable offences. Reference may also be made to the decision given by this Court in Shaifullah and Others Vs. State of U.P. & Another; 2013 (83) ACC 278 and Pramod & Another Vs. State of U.P. & Another (Application U/S 482 No.12174 of 2020, decided on 23rd February, 2021) and Daxaben Vs. State of Gujarat, reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 936 in which the law expounded by the Apex court in the aforesaid cases has been explained in detail.
B.S. Joshi & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Anr on 13 March, 2003
(i). B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and Another; (2003)4 SCC 675,
Nikhil Merchant vs C.B.I. & Anr on 20 August, 2008
(ii). Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation; (2008) 9 SCC 677,