Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.29 seconds)Damodar S.Prabhu vs Sayed Babalal H on 3 May, 2010
In view of the above, in the present case, when the
complainant does not have any objection to accept the settled
amount and further he is ready to forego the costs to be imposed
in terms of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Damodar
S. Prabhu's case (supra).
M.P. State Legal Service Authority vs Prateek Jain And Anr on 10 September, 2014
After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and
taking into consideration the fact that the parties have settled
their dispute(s) by way of the compromise dated 23.01.2019,
coupled with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in
Prateek Jain's case (supra) and keeping in view the
7 of 8
::: Downloaded on - 06-06-2021 08:35:59 :::
CRR-2996-2018 (O&M)
& 4 other cases [8]
specific/special reasons, this Court deviates from the conditions
laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Damodar S. Prabhu's
case (supra) and grants permission to the parties to compound
the offence punishable under Section 138 N.I.Act. Accordingly,
the impugned judgments and orders passed by the Courts below
are set aside. The complaints under Section 138 N.I.Act are
dismissed and the petitioner is acquitted of the notice(s) of
accusation served upon him.
Rajendra Kumar Thakur vs State Of Chhattisgarh 34 ... on 27 March, 2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner apart from heavily
relying upon the said judgment, relies upon the order dated
06.08.2019 passed in Rajendra Vs. Nand Lal, 2020(1) RCR (Crl.)
166, wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court, has held as under:-
1