Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.27 seconds)
Mohan vs C.Udayachand on 14 August, 2019 cites

S. Ramesh vs A. Ramakichenane on 30 October, 2015

14. It was submitted that the above decision was followed by this court by passing its decision in S.Ramesh and others vs A.Ramakichenane rendered in CRP (NPD) Nos. 1472, 1487 and 1567 of 2015. The contention is that the respondent-landlord was not in possession of a valid building permit for construction of the building to demolish and therefore the respondent-landlord did not prove his bona fide was negatived by this court following the above decision. The decision of this court in CRP (NPD) Nos.
Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 1 - K K Sasidharan - Full Document

Nidhi vs Ram Kripal Sharma (D) Thr. Lrs on 7 February, 2017

23. It may be apt to refer to a passaged from Nidhi v. Ram Kripal Sharma, (2017) 5 SCC 640. The Hon’ble Supreme Court held that, “the legislations made for dealing with such landlord-tenant disputes were pro- tenant as the court tends to bend towards the tenant in order to do justice with the tenant; but in the process of doing justice the court cannot be overzealous and forget its duty towards the landlord also as ultimately, it http://www.judis.nic.in 10 is the landlord who owns the property and is entitled to possession of the same when he proves his bona fide beyond reasonable doubt as it is in the case before this Court.”
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 18 - R Banumathi - Full Document
1   2 Next