Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.27 seconds)

Teesta Agro Industries Ltd., Kolkata vs Dcit, Cir-12(2), Kolkata, Kolkata on 15 May, 2018

4. Next comes sec. 14A r.w.s. 8D(2)(ii) proportionate interest disallowance of ₹2,10,760 in relation to exempt income of ₹51,500/-. Suffice to say, assessee's aggregating balance of shareholders fund was on 31.03.2011 and ITA No.1242/Kol/2018 A.Y.2012-13 Teesta Valley Exports Ltd. V. DCIT, Cir-4(2), Kol. Page 4 assessee's interest free funds are of ₹566,91,868 & ₹604,37,914/- as against the investments of ₹39,29,975//- as on 31.03.2012.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Kolkata Cites 5 - Cited by 76 - Full Document

Teesta Valley Exports Ltd., Kolkata vs Dcit, Circle 4(2), Kolkata, Kolkata on 18 July, 2018

"2. We come to the first issue of warehousing charges disallowance amounting to ₹10,38,944/- on account of non-deduction of TDS under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The assessee claimed to have paid two individuals namely Proloy Neogy and ITA No.399/Kol/2017 A.Y. 2013-14 Teesta Valley Exports Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Circle 4(2), Kolkata Page 2 Bannya Neogy for having incurred the impugned warehousing charges on its behalf ultimately paid to third party payees. The Assessing Officer disallowed the same on account of its failure in deducting TDS thereupon under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The CIT(A) upholds the Assessing Officer's action as follows:
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Kolkata Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1