Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.23 seconds)
Ramchandra Jakappa Nandavadekar And ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Through ... on 9 April, 2025
cites
Section 25 in The Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 [Entire Act]
Section 25A in The Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 [Entire Act]
The Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 144T in The Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 [Entire Act]
Ahmednagar Zilla S.D.V. And P. Sangh ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 5 November, 2003
It is thus crystal clear that without following the prescribed
statutory procedure, the petitioners have been treated as non-
members of the Society. The action of the Society is contrary to
settled law and thus arbitrary in nature resulting in violation of
the provisions of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. As held by
16/18
::: Uploaded on - 10/04/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 12/04/2025 10:18:33 :::
902-WP-4228-25 JUDGMENT.doc Rameshwar Dilwale
the Supreme Court in Ahmednagar Zilla SDV and P Sangh Limited
and another (supra), in a given case if the voters list is found to
have been illegally prepared, there would be a scope for
interference.
Dattatray Genaba Lole And Ors vs The Divisional Joint Registrar Co Op Soc ... on 26 November, 2021
On this ground,
8/18
::: Uploaded on - 10/04/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 12/04/2025 10:18:33 :::
902-WP-4228-25 JUDGMENT.doc Rameshwar Dilwale
the action of removal of their names from the Membership
Register had been undertaken without granting them any
opportunity and without following the procedure prescribed. As a
result, the petitioners were deprived of participating in the
elections of the Managing Committee in an arbitrary manner. The
number of members deprived from participating in the elections
was substantial thus vitiating the elections itself. To substantiate
his contentions in this regard, the learned counsel placed reliance
on the decisions in Rajan Dinkarrao Pharate & Ors. Vs. State of
Maharashtra & Ors. 1997 (1) Mh.L.J. 543, K. Venkatachalam Vs.
A. Swamickan & Anr. AIR 1999 SC 1723, Election Commission of
India through Secretary Vs. Ashok Kumar & Ors. AIR 2000 SC
2979, Ahmednagar Zilla S.D.V. and P. Sangh Ltd. & Anr. Vs. State
of Maharashtra & Ors. (2004) 1 SCC 133, Pundlik Vs. State of
Maharashtra & Ors. (2005) 7 SCC 181, Dattatray Genaba Lole and
Ors. Vs. The Divisional Joint Registrar and Ors. 2021:BHC-
AS:17316-DB and Sadashiv Shivaji Dhenge Vs. State of
Maharashtra and Ors. 2024:BHC-NAG:1573-DB. It was thus
submitted that the petitioners be granted the reliefs as prayed for.
Shree Vitthal Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana vs Wadikuroli Vividh Karyakari Seva on 29 June, 2010
In Shree Vitthal Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. vs. Wadikuroli
Vividh Karyakari Seva Society and Others, 2010 (5) Mh.L.J. 376, it
has been held in paragraph 5 as under:-