Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.89 seconds)
Si Maya Devi vs State (Nct Of Delhi) & Ors. on 8 February, 2024 cites

Ajit Kumar vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 22 November, 2022

44. As also earlier directed in Ajit Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi) (supra), this Court once again, by way of abundant caution, directs all the learned Judicial Officers to exercise utmost restraint and judicial discipline while deciding the cases before them and refrain from judging the credibility of police officers and passing scathing and disparaging remarks against them, when the same are not required for the adjudication of matters before them."
Delhi High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 3 - S K Sharma - Full Document

Dr. Dilip Kumar Deka & Anr vs State Of Assam & Anr on 10 September, 1996

In Dr. Dilip Kumar Deka v. State of Assam & Anr., (1996) 6 SCC 234, the Supreme Court delved into the issue of the tests to be applied for deciding the question of expunction of disparaging remarks against authorities and observed that nature of remarks made by a learned Judge casts a serious aspersion on the person commented on affecting his character and reputation and may ultimately impact his career. Relevant passages from the judgment are as follows:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 44 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

The State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Mohammad Naim on 15 March, 1963

"6. The tests to be applied while dealing with the question of expunction of disparaging remarks against a person or authorities whose conduct comes in for consideration before a court of law in cases to be decided by it were succinctly laid down by this Court in State of U.P. v. Mohd. Naim [AIR 1964 SC 703 : (1964) 1 Cri LJ 549 : (1964) 2 SCR 363] . Those tests are:
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 234 - S K Das - Full Document

Jage Ram, Inspector Of Police & Anr vs Hans Raj Midha on 18 November, 1971

The above tests have been quoted with approval and applied by this Court in its subsequent judgments in Jage Ram v. Hans Raj Midha [(1972) 1 SCC 181 : 1972 SCC (Cri) 118 : AIR 1972 SC 1140], R.K. Lakshmanan v. A.K. Srinivasan [(1975) 2 SCC 466 : 1975 SCC (Cri) 654 : AIR 1975 SC 1741] and Niranjan Patnaik v. Sashibhusan Kar [(1986) 2 SCC 569 : 1986 SCC (Cri) 196 : AIR 1986 SC 819]
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 45 - P J Reddy - Full Document

R. K. Lakshmanan vs A. K. Srinivasan & Anr on 1 August, 1975

The above tests have been quoted with approval and applied by this Court in its subsequent judgments in Jage Ram v. Hans Raj Midha [(1972) 1 SCC 181 : 1972 SCC (Cri) 118 : AIR 1972 SC 1140], R.K. Lakshmanan v. A.K. Srinivasan [(1975) 2 SCC 466 : 1975 SCC (Cri) 654 : AIR 1975 SC 1741] and Niranjan Patnaik v. Sashibhusan Kar [(1986) 2 SCC 569 : 1986 SCC (Cri) 196 : AIR 1986 SC 819]
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 74 - R S Sarkaria - Full Document

Niranjan Patnaik vs Sashibhusan Kar & Anr on 11 April, 1986

The above tests have been quoted with approval and applied by this Court in its subsequent judgments in Jage Ram v. Hans Raj Midha [(1972) 1 SCC 181 : 1972 SCC (Cri) 118 : AIR 1972 SC 1140], R.K. Lakshmanan v. A.K. Srinivasan [(1975) 2 SCC 466 : 1975 SCC (Cri) 654 : AIR 1975 SC 1741] and Niranjan Patnaik v. Sashibhusan Kar [(1986) 2 SCC 569 : 1986 SCC (Cri) 196 : AIR 1986 SC 819]
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 113 - V B Eradi - Full Document
1   2 3 Next