Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.23 seconds)
Sbi Cards & Payments Services Pvt. Ltd. vs Harandra Narayan Mahapatra & Anr. on 9 January, 2026
cites
Anil Rai vs State Of Bihar on 6 August, 2001
10. It is not that the situation with which we are dealing in these
Appeals has arisen for consideration for the first time. The directions
have already been issued by this Court in Anil Rai (supra).
Section 18 in The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 [Entire Act]
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Section 21 in The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Ghaziabad Development Authority vs Balbir Singh on 17 March, 2004
F. The award of compensation of Rs. 5,00,000/- was arbitrary and
unsupported by reasons, and contrary to the law laid down
in Ghaziabad Development Authority v. Balbir Singh.
R.C.Sharma vs Union Of India & Ors on 6 May, 1976
43. Should the situation continue to remain so helpless for all
concerned? The Apex Court made an exhortation in 1976 through
a judgment which is reported as R.C Sharma v. Union of
India (1976) 3 SCC 574 for expediting delivery of judgments. I too
wish to repeat those words as follows: (SCC Headnote)
"Nevertheless an unreasonable delay between hearing of
arguments and delivery of judgment, unless explained by
exceptional or extraordinary circumstances, is highly undesirable
even when written arguments are submitted. It is not unlikely that
some points which the litigant considers important may have
escaped notice. But, what is more important is that litigants must
have complete confidence in the results of litigation. This
confidence tends to be shaken if there is excessive delay between
hearing of arguments and delivery of judgments."
State Of Punjab vs Jagdev Singh Talwandi on 16 December, 1983
9. Some High Courts have adopted practice of pronouncing the final
order without reasoned judgment, which is not delivered for
substantial length of time depriving the aggrieved party of the
opportunity to seek further judicial redressal. Deprecating such
practice, this Court in State of Punjab and Ors. vs. Jagdev Singh
Talwandi, (1984) 1 SCC 596 issued directions which were restated
time and again on several occasions including in Zahira Habibulla
H. Sheikh and Anr. vs. State of Gujarat and Ors., (2004) 4 SCC
158, Mangat Ram vs. State of Haryana, (2008) 7 SCC 96 and
Ajay Singh and Anr. vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Anr., (2017) 3
SCC 330 and two recent judgments in the matter of Balaji Baliram
Mupade and Anr. vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors., (2021) 12
SCC 603 and Ratilal Jhaverbhai Parmar and Ors. vs. State of
Gujarat and Ors., 2024 INSC 801 in which one of us (Justice
Prashant Kumar Mishra) is a member and K. Madan Mohan Rao
vs. Bheemrao Baswanthrao Patil and Ors., 2022 INSC 1025 .
Zahira Habibulla H Sheikh And Anr vs State Of Gujarat And Ors on 12 April, 2004
9. Some High Courts have adopted practice of pronouncing the final
order without reasoned judgment, which is not delivered for
substantial length of time depriving the aggrieved party of the
opportunity to seek further judicial redressal. Deprecating such
practice, this Court in State of Punjab and Ors. vs. Jagdev Singh
Talwandi, (1984) 1 SCC 596 issued directions which were restated
time and again on several occasions including in Zahira Habibulla
H. Sheikh and Anr. vs. State of Gujarat and Ors., (2004) 4 SCC
158, Mangat Ram vs. State of Haryana, (2008) 7 SCC 96 and
Ajay Singh and Anr. vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Anr., (2017) 3
SCC 330 and two recent judgments in the matter of Balaji Baliram
Mupade and Anr. vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors., (2021) 12
SCC 603 and Ratilal Jhaverbhai Parmar and Ors. vs. State of
Gujarat and Ors., 2024 INSC 801 in which one of us (Justice
Prashant Kumar Mishra) is a member and K. Madan Mohan Rao
vs. Bheemrao Baswanthrao Patil and Ors., 2022 INSC 1025 .