Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.31 seconds)Section 11 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 42 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Section 15 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 14 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Dda vs M/S Tara Chand Sumit Construction Co. on 12 May, 2020
13. The Delhi High Court in Tara Chand Sumit Construction Co.
(supra) Tara Chand Sumit Construction Co.) has noticed both Cabra
Instalaciones Y. Servicios (supra) and Nilesh Ramanbhai Patel &
Ors. (supra). It has held that an application under Section 29A of the
Act of 1996 would lie only before the Court, which has the power to
appoint arbitrator under Section 11 of the Act of 1996.
Section 29 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Hanumandass Rajkumar Private Limited vs Trilok Kumar Jha on 11 June, 2019
22. The parties have not brought any material on record to
establish that there has been a change of view subsequent to the order
dated July 10, 2020 passed by the Supreme Court in Suo Motu Writ
Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020. Consequently, in accordance with the ratio
laid down in Hanumandass Rajkumar Pvt. Ltd. (supra), although
this Court has jurisdiction to try and determine this petition, it is
premature.