Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 39 (0.38 seconds)Section 34 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 48 in The Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
The English And Foreign Languages University Act, 2006
Section 34 in The Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
The Arbitration Act, 1940
The Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Balraj Taneja & Anr vs Sunil Madan & Anr on 8 September, 1999
90. Mr. Chinoy had contended that in view of provisions of section 16(b)
and (c)the petitioners are not entitled to specific performance and that the
mandatory nature of compliance was well settled law and as observed by the
Supreme Court in Balraj Taneja & Anr. vs. Sunil Madan & Anr.(1999) 8
SCC 396 and Raj Kishore(dead) by LRs.vs. Prem Singh & Ors. (2011)1
SCC 657 as also in B. Vijaya Bharathi vs. P Savitri (2018) 11 SCC 761.
Mr. Chinoy contended that the legal pre-conditions urged are not technical in
::: Uploaded on - 10/01/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 11/01/2019 05:06:52 :::
*82* carbp-442.17(Prysmian)09012019.odt
nature. They embody basic principles of justice and equity and constitute
fundamental principles of law.