Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.31 seconds)The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 300 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 304 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Surinder Kumar vs Union Territory, Chandigarh on 8 March, 1989
In 'Surinder Kumar v. Union Territory of Chandigarh' (1989)
2 SCC 217, the Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down the
requirements for invoking Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC :
Nadodi Jayaraman Etc vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 28 April, 1992
In Nadodi Jayaraman vs. State of Tamilnadu, AIR 1993 SC
777, where 32 injuries were caused to the deceased, most of the
injuries were on non vital parts of the body, on the facts and in
the circumstances of the case, the court held that appellant
therein do not appear to have had the intention of causing the
death of the deceased or even causing such bodily injuries likely
to cause death. They can at the best be attributed with the
knowledge that their act is likely to cause death or causing such
bodily injury as was likely to cause death.
Section 27 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Ashrafkhan @ Babu Munnekhan Pathan & Anr vs State Of Gujarat on 26 September, 2012
In Babu's case (supra), the court observed that the culpable
homicide is not murder if it is committed without premeditation in
a sudden fight in the heat of passion upon sudden quarrel
provided that offender has not taken undue advantage or acted in
accrual or unusual manner. In the said case, there was no
evidence to show that deceased was armed with in any manner
and on the other hand, the accused persons were armed with
knives and attacked the deceased on his head and face even after
he fell down and thus, the court opined that offenders having
taken undue advantage and acted in cruel and unusual manner
towards the deceased were rightly held guilty of the offences
under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC.