Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.32 seconds)
Durgapur Corporation Private Limited vs Aryan Ispat And Power Private Limited on 10 April, 2026
cites
Section 92 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 91 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Shree Ambica Medical Stores vs The Surat Peoples Co-Operative Bank Ltd on 28 January, 2020
21. Next judgment relied by the Appellant is in the matter of "Shree
Ambica Medical Stores vs. Surat People's Coop. Bank Ltd., (2020) 13
SCC 564", where the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the Court by
interpretative process cannot rewrite or create a new contract between the
parties and have to simply apply the terms and conditions of the agreement
as agreed between the parties. There can be no dispute to the above
proposition.
General Assurance Society Ltd vs Chandumull Jain And Anr on 7 February, 1966
To the same effect is judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in
"General Assurance Society Ltd. vs. Chandumull Jain, 1966 SCC
OnLine SC 208".
Sudarshan Cargo Pvt Ltd vs M/S Techvac Engineering Pvt Ltd on 25 June, 2013
23. Learned counsel for the Appellant has place reliance on judgment of
High Court of Karnataka in "Sudarshan Cargo v. Techvac Engineering,
2013 SCC Online Kar 5063" where the Karnataka High Court had
occasion to examine the expression 'sign' or 'signed' under Section 18 of the
Limitation Act, 1963. In Para 23 of the judgment following has been
observed:
Mobilox Innovations Private Ltd vs Kirusa Software Private Ltd on 21 September, 2017
25. We need to notice judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Mobilox
Innovations (P) Ltd. vs. Kirusa Software (P) Ltd., (2018) 1 SCC 353"