Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.26 seconds)Trivandrum Co-Operative District ... vs Deputy Registrar Of Co-Operative ... on 3 July, 1975
3. The petitioner has chosen, not to point out the lack of jurisdiction of the
Registrar or the Government before those authorities, when the matter was heard.
The petitioner who took the chance before both the forums, cannot be permitted to
turn round and cry about the lack of jurisdiction when the decision goes against her.
This is a well settled principle in writ jurisdiction. See the decision of the Division
Bench in Trivandrum Co-operative District Wholesale Society v. Deputy
WPC 30013/05 4
Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Trivandrum (1975 KLT 589).
M.M. Thomas vs State Op Kerala And Anr on 6 January, 2000
This statement of law has been quoted with approval by our Apex
Court in more than one decision. The latest of them is M.M.Thomas
v. State of Kerala (2000(1) SCC 666). Therein, it was held,
"15. In Halsbury's Laws of England (4th Edn. Vol. 10, para 713), it is
stated thus :
M.V. Elisabeth And Ors vs Harwan Investment And Trading Pvt. ... on 26 February, 1992
16. Referring to the said passage and relying on the decision of
this Court in Naresh Shridhar Mirajkar (AIR 1967 SC 1), a two Judge
Bench of this Court in M.V.Elisabeth v. Harwan Investment &
Trading (`P) Ltd (AIR 1993 SC 1914) has observed thus : (AIR
Headnote),
'The High Court in India are superior courts of record. They
have inherent and plenary powers. Unless expressly or
impliedly barred and subject to the appellate or discretionary
jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, the High Courts have
unlimited jurisdiction.................'.
Mohammad Swalleh & Ors. V vs Iiird Addl. District Judge, Meerut & Anr on 4 November, 1987
4. Even assuming an order is passed by an authority having no jurisdiction,
still, this Court need not interfere with the same if justice has been done. See the
decision of the Apex Court in Mohammed Swalleh v. IIIrd Additional District
Judge (1988 (1) SCC 40). The relevant portion of the said Judgment reads as
follows:
Sooryanathan vs State Of Kerala on 24 September, 2003
In Sooryanathan v. State of Kerala (2004(1) KLT 383), this Court considered
the contention regarding the maintainability of an appeal filed after the period of
limitation was over, based on the directions of this Court. In the said decision, it was
held as follows :
Section 70B in Kerala Cooperative Societies Act, 1969 [Entire Act]
1