Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 46 (0.63 seconds)Article 19 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Section 3 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Ranojirao Shinde & Anr on 21 March, 1968
Turning now to the authorities, we
find that, apart from the view of the majority judges in
Kameshwar Singh's case and the decision in the State of
Madhya Pradesh v. Ranojirao Shinde (supra), there is no
other decision of this Court which has taken the view that
choses in action cannot be compulsorily acquired under
Article 31, clause (2). There are in fact subsequent
decisions which clearly seem to suggest the, contrary.