Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.54 seconds)Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Avtar Singh vs Central Bureau Of Investigation ... on 1 March, 2011
After giving my thoughtful consideration to the matter, it may
be noticed that the case of the petitioner is covered by order dated
01.03.2011 (Annexure P-23) passed by this Court in Avtar Singh versus
Central Bureau of Investigation through Superintendent of Police,
Chandigarh (Criminal Miscellaneous No.M-7206 of 2010). The
allegations against petitioner-Inder Sain are somewhat similar to that of
Avtar Singh. It may also be noticed that the prosecution has cited 75
witnesses in the case and the learned counsel appearing for the
respondent-CBI has submitted that the prosecution has examined 27
witnesses till date and seven have been given up. Therefore, about 41
witnesses remain. However, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the
CBI-respondent that the prosecution is likely to examine only 10-15 more
Crl. Misc.No.M-557 of 2011
-4-
witnesses and the rest are likely to be given up. It may also be noticed that
Baba Gurmeet Singh who is the main accused in the case was granted
anticipatory bail by this Court and subsequently was granted regular bail by
the learned trial Court. Against the order granting pre-arrest bail to Baba
Gurmeet Singh SLP (Criminal No.6583 of 2007 titled Aridaman
Chhatarpati Versus Sant Gurmeet Ram Rahim and another was filed in
the Hon'ble Supreme Court, which was dismissed on 03.10.2007.
Therefore, the main accused in the case has not been in custody for a
single day. The petitioner, however, is in custody for the last about five
years.
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Mulkh Raj vs State Of Punjab on 24 February, 1972
In support of his
contention, reliance has been placed on judgments of this Court in the
cases of Mail Kaur versus State of Haryana, 1992(2) AICLR 83 and
Mulakh Raj versus State of Punjab, 1998(1) RCR (Criminal) 43; besides,
of the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court in Smt. Lahari Bai versus State of
Rajasthan , 1996 Criminal Law 1400. It is also submitted that the
petitioner had surrendered on 06.11.2006 and before that he was
absconding.
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Smt. Lahari Bai vs State Of Rajasthan on 3 February, 1995
In support of his
contention, reliance has been placed on judgments of this Court in the
cases of Mail Kaur versus State of Haryana, 1992(2) AICLR 83 and
Mulakh Raj versus State of Punjab, 1998(1) RCR (Criminal) 43; besides,
of the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court in Smt. Lahari Bai versus State of
Rajasthan , 1996 Criminal Law 1400. It is also submitted that the
petitioner had surrendered on 06.11.2006 and before that he was
absconding.
1