Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.24 seconds)Section 227 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Union Of India vs Prafulla Kumar Samal & Anr on 6 November, 1978
21. Though it can be argued that on the basis of statement of
complainant, a suspicion arises against the revisionists, however it is a
settled law that mere suspicion shall not suffice for framing charge
against any accused and the test is that of 'grave suspicion'. Reliance is
placed upon judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of Union of
India vs. Prafulla Kumar Samal and Ors., AIR 1979 SC 366, wherein it
was held that the Court has the power to sift and weigh the evidence for
the limited purpose of finding out whether a prima facie case against the
accused is made out or not.
Section 227 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 228 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Krishna Lal Chawla vs State Of U.P. on 8 March, 2021
17. The Apex Court in the case of Krishna Lal Chawla & Anr. v. State
of UP (2021) 5SCC 435 put emphasis upon the trial courts to be more
vigilant while appreciating the facts at the stage of consideration of
charge and made following observations:
Subrata Roy Sahara vs Uoi & Ors on 6 May, 2014
In 2014, this Court elucidated as
follows, the plight of a litigant caught in the cobweb of
frivolous proceedings in Subrata Roy Sahara v. Union of
India, (2014) 8SCC 470:"191...One needs to keep in mind,
that in the process of litigation, there is an innocent
sufferer on the other side, of every irresponsible and
senseless claim.
Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam vs The State Of Bihar on 8 February, 2022
Reliance
is placed upon judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in Kahkashan Kausar @
Sonam & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors, 2022 SCC Online SC 162 (Crl.
Appeal No. 195/2022 decided on 08.02.2022) and the important
observations are as follows: