Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.17 seconds)
Mr. Mohammed Sadathulla vs Regional Commissioner on 4 April, 2025 cites

Jyoti Basu & Others vs Debi Ghosal & Others on 26 February, 1982

4. The learned advocates appearing for the petitioners despite vehement submissions are not in a position to show the special circumstances that warrant the invocation of writ jurisdiction constitutionally vested in this Court; the matter relating to election and election disputes have to be treated by the special Tribunals constituted under the Act in tune with the observations of the Apex Court in JYOTHI BASU vs. DEBI PRASAD GHOSAL, (1982) 3 SCR 318; this apart, the Writ Court cannot interdict the statutory electoral process consistent with what has been said in MOHINDER SINGH GILL vs. CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER, AIR 1978 SC 851.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 430 - O C Reddy - Full Document

Mohinder Singh Gill & Anr vs The Chiief Election Commissioner, New ... on 2 December, 1977

4. The learned advocates appearing for the petitioners despite vehement submissions are not in a position to show the special circumstances that warrant the invocation of writ jurisdiction constitutionally vested in this Court; the matter relating to election and election disputes have to be treated by the special Tribunals constituted under the Act in tune with the observations of the Apex Court in JYOTHI BASU vs. DEBI PRASAD GHOSAL, (1982) 3 SCR 318; this apart, the Writ Court cannot interdict the statutory electoral process consistent with what has been said in MOHINDER SINGH GILL vs. CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER, AIR 1978 SC 851.
Supreme Court of India Cites 56 - Cited by 4221 - V R Iyer - Full Document
1