Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.31 seconds)Jagdish Prasad Srivastava vs Xth Addl. District And Sessions Judge, ... on 11 January, 1999
3. So far as question of maintainability of the revision against the order dismissing the application by the Rent Control and Eviction Officer for summoning Smt. Sudha Rani Jaiswal is concerned it is conceded by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that no revision lies under Section 18 of the Act. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has relied upon a decision of this Court reported in 2004 (1) ARC 362, Ajay Pal Singh v. District Judge, Meerut and Ors., wherein according to learned Counsel for the petitioner this Court has referred the matter for consideration by a Larger Bench by formulating questions in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Jagdish v. District Judge, Kanpur Nagar and Ors., 2002 (1) ARC 327. A perusal of the order passed by learned Judge, relied by learned Counsel for the petitioner, runs as under:-
Talib Husain And Anr. vs Ist Additional District Judge, ... on 3 October, 1985
Thus so far as the release application filed by the landlord is concerned the petitioner-occupant who has been declared unauthorised occupant cannot have any say in view of Full Bench decision reported in 1986 (1) ARC 1, Talib Hasan and Anr. v. Ist Additional District Judge, Nainital and Ors., and the decision of Apex Court in the case of Nanakram v. Kundalrai, (1986) 3 SCC 83 : 1986 SCFBRC 315.
Nanakram Etc vs Kundalrai Etc on 29 April, 1986
Thus so far as the release application filed by the landlord is concerned the petitioner-occupant who has been declared unauthorised occupant cannot have any say in view of Full Bench decision reported in 1986 (1) ARC 1, Talib Hasan and Anr. v. Ist Additional District Judge, Nainital and Ors., and the decision of Apex Court in the case of Nanakram v. Kundalrai, (1986) 3 SCC 83 : 1986 SCFBRC 315.
The U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972
1