Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 23 (0.29 seconds)

Raj Kumar Dey And Others vs Tarapada Dey And Others on 14 September, 1987

In Raj Kumar Dey and Ors. v. Tarapada Dey and Ors. , the Supreme Court examined the scope of a stay order on calculation of time/limitation. In this case, an award could not be registered within the time stipulated by the Registration Act owing to an interim injunction and an order directing the award to be deposited in Court. The Supreme Court allowed the entire period during which the stay order was in operation to be excluded while applying the maxim lex non cogit ad impossibilia or the law does not compel a man to do that which he cannot possibly perform.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 142 - S Mukharji - Full Document

Auto & Metal Engineers And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 23 April, 1997

39. The Supreme Court in Auto and Metal Engineers and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors. has examined in detail as to what constitutes assessment proceeding. The Apex Court, while interpreting a provision pari materia to Explanation 1 to Section 158BE(2) of the Act, which also provides for extension of limitation for completion of assessment in certain contingencies, observed and we quote:
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 25 - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Dhariwal Sales Enterprises on 9 February, 1996

In Commissioner of Income Tax v. Dhariwal Sales Enterprises , a Division Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court observed that in a case where special audit report under 142(2A) of the Act was called for but could not be submitted, the time period spent for obtaining a copy of the report up to the time when intimation of non submission was given by assessed could be excluded.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 9 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next