Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (1.14 seconds)

Sahara India Commercial Corporation ... vs B. Jeejeebhoy Vakharia And Associates ... on 4 June, 2007

6. The learned counsel for the petitioner however by relying upon the decision in Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd. Vs. B.Jeejeebhoy Vakharia and Associates, 2008(5) Mh.L.J. 803 and Tirupati Ginning and Pressing Factory Vs. M/s. Balaji Ginning and Pressing Industry Akola and others, submits that in absence of any prior notice under Section 164 of the said Act, the suit itself was not maintainable.
Bombay High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 4 - D K Deshmukh - Full Document

B.Y. Chavan And Anr vs Association Of Tenants Of The Bombay ... on 25 September, 2018

7. It is found that presently there is no notice of auction by the petitioner-Bank and hence in the facts of the present case, I am inclined to follow the observations as made in para 10 of the decision in B.Y.Chavan and another (supra). On that basis, the plaintiff could be permitted to cure defect by deleting the name of the Bank and thereafter seek to add it subsequently after giving notice under Section 164 of the said Act.
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - K R Shriram - Full Document
1