Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.17 seconds)Section 116 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Raghu Nath Ray vs Nityananda Sahu And Ors. on 14 February, 1956
The right of the defendant, which was conferred upon him by Section 13 was not affected by the grant of a certificate by the Rent Controller, for, even if the Controller did grant a certificate, the defendant still could put the plaintiff to the proof of his bona fides in court. An amending statute which is remedial in its nature has to be construed as being retrospective and applicable to pending suits. I am supported in this view by a recent decision of the Orissa High Court in Raghu Nath Ray v. Nityananda Sahu AIR 1956 Orissa 175 (B).
1