Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.22 seconds)Section 9 in Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 [Entire Act]
The Punjab Municipal Act, 1999
Bengal Nagpur Railway Co. Ltd. vs Corporation Of Calcutta on 20 March, 1942
These passages bring out in bold relief the distinction
between the English and the Indian law which has already
been pointed out by the Judicial Committee in Bengal Nagpur
Railway Company Limited v. Corporation of Calcutta (1).
That is why, while in England the value of occupation by a
tenant is the criterion for fixing the, standard rent under
the rating law, under the Act the letting value of a
building to the landlord is the standard in fixing the,
rental value. If this distinction is borne in mind much of
the cloud cast in this case is dispelled. It would be
instructive to quote the weighty observations of Atkin, L.
J., as he then was, which were approved by Lord Carson in
his dissenting judgment ; and they are
",If no higher rent than the standard rent and
statutory increases is enforceable, as a
matter of common sense that seems to be the
limit of the rent a tenant can be reasonably
expected to give.................. "