Bhagirath vs Ram Prasad And Anr. on 10 September, 1986
28. Thus, having gone through the impugned judgment of the learned first Appellate Court, it cannot be said that the learned First Appellate Court has misread the evidence in the manner that it assumes certain evidence to exist where there was none. It also cannot be said that by placing the reliance on the two judgments of this Court in Radhavallabh's case (supra) and Bhagirath's case (supra), the learned First Appellate Court has committed error and misread the evidence pr law on the point in issue, the judgment of the learned First Appellate Court is based on correct appreciation of evidence led by the parties.