Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.22 seconds)Section 320 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 341 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
B.S. Joshi & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Anr on 13 March, 2003
In such circumstances, the
mere fact that Section 294 (b) IPC is not compoundable in terms
of the provisions under 320, Cr.P.C. cannot by itself is a reason
to decline exercise of inherent power under Section 482, Cr.P.C.
going by the decision of the Honourable Supreme Court in
B.S.Joshi V. State of Haryana reported in 2003 (2) KLT 1062
(SC). The submissions made on behalf of the second respondent
along with Annexure-C affidavit would undoubtedly reveal that
Crl.M.C.No.955 of 2013
3
the continuation of proceedings in S.T.No.3866/2010 on the file
of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Attingal has become
unnecessary.
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Gian Singh vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 24 September, 2012
In the circumstances thus obtained in this case it is
the duty of this Court to terminate the criminal proceedings that
become absolutely unnecessary, going by the decision of the
Honourable Supreme Court in Gian Singh V. State of Punjab
reported in 2012(4)KLT 108 . In view of the discussion as above,
I am of the considered view that this is a fit case wherein this
Court should invoke the inherent power under Section 482,
Cr.P.C. to bring about termination of the proceedings in
S.T.No.3866/2010 against the petitioner. Resultantly, the
Crl.M.C. is allowed, Annexure-B Final Report and all further
proceedings pursuant thereto against the petitioner in
S.T.No.3866/2010 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate
Court-II, Attingal are quashed.
1