Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.27 seconds)
Sri Madhavaperumal Temple vs Dhanalakshmi on 3 June, 2019 cites

The Chief Executive Officer, Tamilnadu ... vs P. Venkataraman And The State Of Tamil ... on 17 September, 2007

29.The counsel for the plaintiffs in respect of his contentions has placed reliance upon the decisions reported in 2010 (1) CWC 124 (Arulmighu Thiruvateeswarar Devasthanam, Triplicane, Madras – 5, rep. by its Executive Offiver Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep.by its Secretary, Land Administration Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 9 and 4 others), AIR 1981 MADRAS 318 (G.N.Venkataswamy Vs. Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd., and others) and the judgment of this Court dated 11.07.1996 passed in S.A.No.1397 of 1986 (Sri Madhavaperumal Devasthanam, Mylapore, Madras – 4 reptd., by Executive Officer Vs. Dhanalakshmi and six others).
Madras High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 2 - N N Vasanthakumar - Full Document

G.N. Venkataswamy vs Tamil Nadu Small Industries ... on 7 October, 1980

29.The counsel for the plaintiffs in respect of his contentions has placed reliance upon the decisions reported in 2010 (1) CWC 124 (Arulmighu Thiruvateeswarar Devasthanam, Triplicane, Madras – 5, rep. by its Executive Offiver Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep.by its Secretary, Land Administration Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 9 and 4 others), AIR 1981 MADRAS 318 (G.N.Venkataswamy Vs. Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd., and others) and the judgment of this Court dated 11.07.1996 passed in S.A.No.1397 of 1986 (Sri Madhavaperumal Devasthanam, Mylapore, Madras – 4 reptd., by Executive Officer Vs. Dhanalakshmi and six others).
Madras High Court Cites 78 - Cited by 12 - Full Document

Sri Arthanareeswarar Of Tiruchengode ... vs T.M. Muthuswamy Padayachi, M. ... on 5 August, 2002

29.The counsel for the plaintiffs in respect of his contentions has placed reliance upon the decisions reported in 2010 (1) CWC 124 (Arulmighu Thiruvateeswarar Devasthanam, Triplicane, Madras – 5, rep. by its Executive Offiver Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep.by its Secretary, Land Administration Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 9 and 4 others), AIR 1981 MADRAS 318 (G.N.Venkataswamy Vs. Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd., and others) and the judgment of this Court dated 11.07.1996 passed in S.A.No.1397 of 1986 (Sri Madhavaperumal Devasthanam, Mylapore, Madras – 4 reptd., by Executive Officer Vs. Dhanalakshmi and six others).
Madras High Court Cites 38 - Cited by 41 - Full Document

A.T.S. Chinnaswami Chettiar Etc vs Sri Kari Varadaraja Perumal Temple & ... on 22 September, 1995

Similarly, the counsel for the temple placed reliance upon the decisions reported in (1997-I-L.W.430) (Muthusamy Gounder & 13 others Vs.Arulmigu Varadaraja perumal Temple at Nathakadaiyur, rep.by its fit person K.Chinnasami and 10 others), 1996-2-L.W.231 (Sri Madhavaperumal Devasthanam, Mylapore, Madras – 4 represented by Executive Officer Vs.Dhanalakshmi and six others) and 1995 Supp (3) Supreme Court Cases 724 (A.T.S.Chinnaswami Chettiar and others Vs. Sri Kari Varadaraja perumal Temple and another). The principles of law outlined in the abovesaid decisions are taken into consideration and followed as applicable to the case at hand.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 14 - K Venkataswami - Full Document
1