Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.18 seconds)

Doctor Hukam Chand Dhawan vs State Of Punjab Through Secretary To ... on 17 March, 1997

12. Sequelly, it is now well settled proposition of law that the landlord is best judge in regard to his bonafide need. If he considers Civil Revision No.3064 of 2007 6 that the existing accommodation is insufficient and he required better and more accommodation, such need has to be seen from the angle of the landlord and not from the view point of the tenant and opinion of the tenant cannot be imported in it. Reliance in this connection can be placed on the judgment of this Court in Dr.Hukam Chand Dhawan Vs. State of Punjab 1997 (1) RCR 652 and M/s Bajaj Associates and others Vs. Vinod Kumar and others (2009-1) PLR 443.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

M/S Bajaj Associates And Others vs Vinod Kapoor And Others on 19 March, 2009

12. Sequelly, it is now well settled proposition of law that the landlord is best judge in regard to his bonafide need. If he considers Civil Revision No.3064 of 2007 6 that the existing accommodation is insufficient and he required better and more accommodation, such need has to be seen from the angle of the landlord and not from the view point of the tenant and opinion of the tenant cannot be imported in it. Reliance in this connection can be placed on the judgment of this Court in Dr.Hukam Chand Dhawan Vs. State of Punjab 1997 (1) RCR 652 and M/s Bajaj Associates and others Vs. Vinod Kumar and others (2009-1) PLR 443.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 22 - Full Document
1